Published on Mar 31, 2013 by excatholics
March, 2013
FIRST
JESUIT POPE TAKES CONTROL OF THE VATICAN
With
three failed attempts already behind them and under the so-called 'guidance' of the
Holy Spirit, these 'princes' of the Catholic church still couldn't agree as to who
they wanted to replace Benedict
XVI.
At
first it looked as though the fourth vote would fail again, for the smoke appeared
rather grey, but with an explosion of bells ringing from St. Peter's Square, and with
the secular press sounding surprisingly excited, it appeared that in just under 24
hours, Rome's 115 cardinals now had their new man.
My
feeling had been, prior to the voting commencing that Peter Turkson, the man from
Africa, might get it, with Patrick leaning more towards an Italian, possibly Angelo
Scola, the archbishop of Milan, inheriting the so-called 'chair of Peter.' (Incidently, the
London Guardian, reported on March 12, how 'anti-mafia police raided offices in
his diocese,'
so that certainly would not have been the best start for those hoping that the man
from Milan could or would attempt to reform the Catholic church, for such naivety
dogged John
Paul I, who lasted just 33 days in the Vatican. In fact, to suggest it is even
possible to 'clean house' is most certainly delusional thinking.
And
so it was at 7:7pm, Rome time, the Catholic world finally got to see their next 'Shepherd
in chief,' the 76-year-old, Jorge
Mario Bergoglio, from Argentina, and
may I say that at first I thought it was a joke. A little man appeared on the famous
Vatican balcony, looking like a retired banker, and then he gave a rather motionless
wave, resembling something like the Queen of England gives, and then over the next
several minutes, he rambled on and spoke about how his church 'is above all churches'
and how they (all Catholics) must now work together for 'world peace.' (This is the
usual politically correct and non-offensive message that popes and apostates now
proclaim.)
Bergoglio who
also resembles a cross between Pius
XII and John
XXIII must have been something of a damp squib to all those young, zealous
and extreme Catholic fundamentalists around the world, who had hoped to get someone
much younger and charismatic.
For
me, I felt so relieved to no longer be a part of this system.
As
he stood on the balcony, flanked by his fellow cardinals and bishops, he recited the
Lord's Prayer (or as it should be called the
Disciples Prayer) and then off he went into the blasphemous and pointless Hail
Mary. All these so-called 'brains' and yet the simplicity of Christ is totally
lost on them.
The
truth of the matter is whoever had appeared on that famous balcony, whether it be
the Pink Panther, Kermit the Frog or Top Cat, the rapturous response from St. Peter's
Square, would have been the same-deafening and repeated chanting, which is prophetically
found in Scripture, where the pagans chant their allegiance to their female god, Diana
(Acts 19:34.)
Pope
Francis I, as he will now be called, claims to be 'the vicar of Christ' and yet while
the world watched him, he didn't once call on anyone to repent and be born again.
All he offered his audience was a typical safe and placid message, which couldn't
even inspire a bunch of sleepy orangutans.
So
does the voting in of a new pope have any Scriptural support? In short, no! But I
need to highlight a few fatal flaws from those that would suggest otherwise. First
of all, Acts 1 is normally cited as 'evidence' of a precedent, when the early church
met to replace Judas Iscariot. However, if the lazy Catholic or apostate had bothered
to read Acts 1, they would have quickly realized that the Apostles were not voting
in a new leader, they were voting in a replacement to come along side them, and work
with them as they preached the Gospel. Matthias, who they unanimously chose to replace
Judas, via the casting of lots, was a disciple and eyewitness of Jesus' ministry (probably
one of the 70), and therefore he was qualified to join them.
Today,
as there are no apostles or prophets, it would be impossible to re-enact Acts 1.
In
Acts 12, when James the son of Zebedee was martyred, no church council met to replace
him. To those that suggest this was somehow down to the church being dispersed and
unable to gather to replace him, would not Acts 15, therefore, have been an ideal
opportunity to replace him? But when we read Acts 15, with all the church leaders
present, there is no vote to replace James. In fact, James, the son of Zebedee isn't
even mentioned.
So
what we find in Acts 1 was never repeated again and with the Holy Spirit deliberately
omitting any mention of the deaths of Peter, Paul and John, this once again demonstrates
why it is paramount to make the Bible ones final authority and not to venture off
into some man made pagan system of dead rituals and useless traditions.
In the days that have followed Bergoglio's 'anointing'
the world appears to applaud him, with the print press seemingly giving him the thumbs
up. The verse that speaks about the world loving its own, comes to mind (John 15:19.)
As a Jesuit he
will certainly change the dynamics of the Vatican. But for now, and in the short term
at least, I expect very little to come from him and his cohorts. One thing I do believe
we will see from him will be an accelerated promotion of closer ties between Rome
and Islam,
now known as Chrislam. Israel, unfortunately, will of course be the immediate victim
here.
But when push comes to shove, he and his church
will always side with Islam over
Judaism.
It
was also interesting to read a well known Jewish website which stated how, "Bergoglio
attended Rosh Hashanah services at the Benei Tikva Slijot synagogue in September 2007."
It seems the man from Argentina charmed his Jewish audience to no ends and forged
warm ecumenical links with them and no doubt others too. Where is the call to repent
and believe the gospel, however? When was the last time any Catholic cleric, anywhere
in the world, ever proclaimed that Christ is the only way to be saved (John 14:6?)
The true Ambassador of Christ will always be polite and courteous to those of other
faiths, when going about their everyday life, but he/she will never do so at the expense
of the gospel and they certainly would not attend obsolete feasts that dishonour the
Lord Jesus and His finished work on the cross. Sadly, the evil and ever popular ecumenical
movement has totally betrayed Christ and His finished work on the cross, in favour
of forming a one-world religion, that one day will easily and finally be handed over
to the Antichrist.
Also with the selection of the first Latin American pope,
we shall see an even greater push of liberation theology and a reinforced presentation
of socialism and other humanistic interests.
While
I could not bear to bring myself to watch any of his heretical 'inaugurational' mass,
which the BBC shamefully broadcasted live to the world, on two channels simultaneously,
I did manage to see a clip of Francis getting out of his official car, with bodyguards
in tow, and 'blessing' this waiting man in the crowd, on the evening news.
No
doubt his Vatican spin-doctors hoped it would make for a nice photo shoot, not to
mention somewhat exploiting this poor man, but I must ask the following question:
Why didn't the so-called 'successor' to St.
Peter and the 'infallible' 'vicar of Christ' heal him? Didn't
Peter do many open-air healings? So
why can't this pope or any pope do the same?
Isn't
it obvious by now that he and all the other so-called 'vicars of Christ,' a
role if it ever existed,
could only be retained by the Holy Spirit, aren't anything of the kind but just conniving
impostors, deceiving the masses of ignorant people, the world over.
Please
allow me to include two photographs that were taken over the Easter weekend, that
once again demonstrates the wonderful theatre that makes the church of Rome so
'unique.'
It appears that members of the tiny sect of Pre Vatican II Catholics, the ones that
would love to see the return of the old archaic Tridentine Mass, have been furiously
tweeting how bitterly disappointed they were to see Francis not only washing and kissing
prisoners feet, but how he went on to do the same to some women, with one being
a Muslim and another having HIV. They are now 'concerned' about the possibility
of him one day 'ordaining' female priests too.
Without
wishing to sound like a parrot, why doesn't he just preach the true Gospel to his
audience. To allow cameras to see you prostrate on your face is surely Pharisaical.
Nevermind washing the feet of unsaved people, something not found in Scripture,
why not just stop with all these gimmicks and give God the glory by telling the world
how Jesus has paid for their sins and should they repent, and believe on Him, He will
save them instantaneously.
To do anything else, will see sinners go to Hell, forever!
Instead
we see him mimicking Ghandi, with his 'good works and deeds' by trying
to make their lives a little better, when he should be expounding the new birth to
them. Sadly this is something no pope has ever understood or preached, so one needs
to look to the true Shepherd for salvation, not a man who thinks he is 'holy' by dressing
in white, while tragically being just as lost as those whose feet he washed.
So
before I conclude this brief appraisal of Jorge
Mario Bergoglio,
I must share the following secret oath, that all Jesuits take,
something that the secular press to the best of my knowledge have never printed,
let alone even referred too:
"Go
ye, then, into all the world and take possession of all lands in the name of the Pope.
He who will not accept him as the Vicar of Jesus and his Vice-Regent on earth, let
him be accursed and exterminated."
This
is only a very small fragment of their oath and so I would most certainly encourage
further research of this, by looking online. But the above text makes it very clear
how the Jesuit(s) is
bound to posses all lands and those that won't accept the pope (note, they don't say
believe on Jesus or receive Him as ones Saviour) must be accursed, meaning excommunicated
from the Catholic church, which historically meant, going to Hell when one dies, and
for the non-Catholic that refused to submit to the pope, extermination was called
for.
This
chilling oath, in some ways mirrors freemasonry and
their cold-blooded oaths too. In fact, one wonders which came first, Catholic
masonry or Protestant
masonry. Either way, both are not of God and in fact, masonry in any form is anti-Jesus!
Also
of interest, is the unhealthy and banal obsession that masons have with the number
33. There are 33 levels in their Luciferian structure. For the Jesuit to
be allowed to take his oath, he must be 33-years-old. No doubt, when examined
on this, he would suggest that it has to do with the Lord Jesus Christ's death, being
when He was 33-years-old, but once again, unless Scripture explicitly affirms such
a custom, it is best to avoid it at all costs.
Is
it any wonder, therefore how France, Spain and Portugal (all Catholic countries) expelled
the Jesuits from
their shores, only for them to covertly sneak back in, like a pack of unwanted
feral dogs.
In
fact, it must be stated that the Jesuits,
on more than one occasion, have also been banned by various popes, with pope Clement
XIII refusing them entry into Italy, while Clement XIV enjoyed suppressing them.
And
yet Pius V set up a covert school in France, which allowed the Jesuits to
be trained on how to infiltrate and take over the Church of England. This shrewd operation
was concluded by 1884, by which time Canterbury had already fallen.
To
those that naively think the Catholic church (or as it really should be called, 'the
church of Constantine') resembles anything remotely authentic
to the things of God, should refrain from making further ignorant statements,
get on their knees, and seek the Lord's forgiveness and new birth. I should know,
for I did this myself 11 years ago and I have never looked back since.
JAMES'
INTERVIEW ON THE POPE AND ROMAN CATHOLICISM
My
good friend Mark in the US wanted to know what my thoughts were on the pope and the
Vatican in general. Here is the interview.
PATRICK'S
STREET REPORT
Recently
when giving out some of James'
testimony tracts, this gentleman stopped, paused and accepted one, always a good
sign.
This
man informed me, almost apologetically, that he had been a committed member of the Jehovah's
Witnesses cult for over 40 years, but thankfully he had deserted those teachings
and now despised them for what he had been a part of for all of those lost years.
His
problem soon became clear when he informed me that he now believed in nothing at all,
and that death when it arrived, was the final end of everything. I asked him don't
you find this depressing and he agreed with me. But this seems to be the normal journey
that so many others like him, who for whatever reason, quickly leave a religious system
then lapse in to nothing, and instead of rejoicing that they have thrown off the shackles
of organised religion, they now survive in a spiritual void.
On
a personal level in his own case it seems most of his family are still peddling the
watchtower message and have badly ostracized him over his decision to leave. It must
be very painful for him and others who have been brave enough to take this personal
decision, and I sympathise with him in this family matter, that he will have to bear.
However,
I did not find him hostile to what I was saying and he did seem to be listening to
me carefully, even nodding his head in agreement with me, especially when we talked
about the present state of the world and the gradual slide into immorality this country
is experiencing, which he found shocking and disgusting. And on this matter we both
agreed.
Finally,
I did say that I would pray for him and that I hoped this curse of atheism would soon
depart from him and that he would walk with the Lord in a new relationship. He then
thanked me and went his way. I do hope I see him again when we are next on the streets
for an update but this is unlikely as we rarely see the same people twice. But of
course he is just another lost and confused soul existing in this fallen world, and
this is why street work is so important and beneficial to those who will not hear
the true message of the Bible in most mainline churches.
Earlier
on a young girl came up to me and asked what I was doing and what was I giving out.
I informed her that these were Bible tracts and this was a simple way to get a short
Christian message out to the lost of this world.
I
rather teased her remarking that she looked too young to be doing a job of signing
up people to support a national charity. With that she pulled out her passport and
proudly showed it to me, confirming that she was ten years older than she looked.
This was a surprise and amazingly the passport was well worn with heavy usage, as
she has had to do this rather more frequently in the past, she proudly informed me.
But
more importantly she stayed and listened to what I had to tell her before going off
to look for new customers. Happily she took one of our postcard/Bible tracts and I
hope she remembers what I told her.
NEW
TRANSCRIPT
NEW
ARTICLES
NEW
VIDEOS
NEW
MAIL
Hello
Brother, I've been studying w/you thru The Book of Hebrews. 1st off thank you, it
is one of the best studies I've heard on Hebrews.
I did a chp & ver study years ago thru Hebrews every Sunday, it took one year.
But I'm the better for it. I believe it to be one of the most important books of the
NT. May I ask do you have an outline of that teaching of Hebrews? I would love to
refer to it. Thanks again for your ministry. May The Lord Jesus Christ bless you &
yours.
James
and Patrick, I have written you many times in the past, BUT this time I want to TY
for your non-ceasing work of Evangelizing! The hardest people to reach is the Roman
Catholic/Goats or Tares....but I can say, "I will NEVER enter HER doors again!" She
is Babylon and she WILL FALL! It really won't effect our Salvation, who we think the
Antichrist is or where he comes from.... as long as we Believe in Christ! Woe,
to the False Religions 1 John 2:22...they better Repent and Believe for Christ is
coming! This was your BEST Newsletter Ever....much has happened! Keep on praying and
looking up...Christ is Coming! Maranatha. Men of God!
I
cannot tell you how comforted I have felt listening to your excellent shall I say
sermons…..Thank you for your ministry-God richly bless you and your boldness for Him.
You are a brilliant reflection of His glory in a dark, dark world.
Just
to let you know that I'm studying with you right now on Genesis. About and hour into
it already. My wife had bought me a (KJV) note takers bible from 'local church bible
publishers' for Father's Day. And I want to make it into a study Bible "kinda of sort
of for my kids and their kids, when we are long gone, and they can see with sound
teaching. But with your permission only to take your great teachings and place them
in my notes. I will give you the credit for the work. That they will know what you
and your father's ministry is, and of course who you are. Not to blow your head up,
but you are a special guy that has a gift of teaching. I thought John Macarthur was
good when I was a babe in Christ:) But thank you your a blessing and help always James,
may the Almighty bless you and your father.
I
have watched a couple of your videos and see your humble spirit. You speak out about
things that other people are afraid to talk about. And you only hope to save souls.
You have helped me to see good. I am ashamed of my bitter heart towards others and
I have all but given up, till you. Thank you.
I
just stumbled across your website a few days ago. It's been totally liberating. After
I saw your YouTube video on the Study of Galatians Verse-by-Verse, I realized I was
living according the Old Covenant. I was what you called under the law. Do you have
a particular message that explains the New Covenant? I would like to learn all about
the New Covenant that Jesus came to implement. Thanks!
Thanks
again for your hard work & ministry for the Lord & for His glory ~ I followed
again listening to your commentary on 1 Thessalonians & will review them BOTH
again as they are very detailed & encouraging ~ I was listening only ~ so this
next time I plan to follow along with scripture in hand ~ Blessings to you both. Both
commentaries are helping me to be grounded in the PRE-TRIB Rapture doctrine that seems
to be one of your strong-suits & somehow had gone over my head? So do be encouraged
as to its IMPORTANCE in your WORK! = )
DONATE
TO US
To those that would like to support this ministry, you can do so by kindly donating here.
...
...
...
No comments:
Post a Comment