we have the Seventh Day Adventists' belief in their
FALSE prophet, Ellen G. White.
They may use the King James Bible, BUT THEY BELIEVE IT NOT,
WHEN IT IS THEY DISREGARD:
Shame on such "men!"
Shame on such hypocritical women, also, who are unable to stand on the word of God!
God has not had a single woman even write a word in the Scriptures! Esther is believed to have been written by Mordecai;
and Ruth, by Samuel.
I have tired of doing battle with SDA members on this blog, who are so foolish as to think that there is any "discussion" to be had IN ADDITION to the word of God! THERE IS NOT! Nowhere does the word of God instruct any to be "understanding and learn" about the godless beliefs of the lost; rather, it is filled with instruction on how one is to become a believer in the COMPLETED SACRIFICE of the Son of God, Jesus Christ, for our redemption and eternal salvation! NOTHING MORE NEED BE LEARNED!
Early SDAs as much as denied Jesus' deity saying He was only an archangel. This vile prophetess preached that "The man Christ Jesus was not the Lord God Almighty." Source: Ellen G. White (1903, ms 150, SDA; Commentary V. p. 1129). It's an "evolving" religion of its own!
You Seventh Day Adventists DELUDE YOURSELVES if you think you are Christian! You may THINK you worship Jesus, but he is the OTHER Jesus of whom Paul spoke in 2 Corinthians 11:4.
See Another Jesus (2 Corinthians 11:4) by Greg Miller...
Thus, save yourselves some time, for I waste not mine, reading your imbecilities and asinine explanations, left to be posted as comments on various related posts. I have entertained reading all the comments I am going to entertain, on any SDA post, and that is final! The Authorized King James Bible IS my final authority in all matters, and such belief is not up for discussion! PERIOD!!
Prophesy in the
dispensation of Grace
by Pastor Dov Avnon
Published on Nov 18, 2012 by Dov Avnon
spoken unto us by his Son,
...
...
...

No one preached "repent and believe the Gospel" in the Old Testament. The Gospel was a message for that age. Yes, it was a message about a Messiah to come. Yes, the blood was symbolic... much like baptism, today.
My point was that the Gospel (message) preached was not the same and they did not hear, preach or believe the same thing you and I believe hear, preach and believe, today. (continued)
To your point, could you show me where the Scripture ever says Abel knew what you credit him with? continued
There is nothing there about how Jesus died, was buried & was risen again. It's simply a matter of believing that blood covers sin and Messiah would come & provide that blood. continued
Now, if the covenant (and Gospel of blood covenant) that Abel believed was the same as the new covenant (and Gospel of Grace) that our age hears, believes and preaches... how can it be DIFFERENT?
The Scripture is clear but lazy, unlearned College graduates in the pulpits blur the truth & confuse with their "tradition".